Thursday, June 15, 2006
Intimacy
When we are engaged in sex, we are conscious of certain sensual details. The feeling of hair sweeping across our cheeks, scratching against our eyelashes. The warmth of a hand on our waist, the stickiness of it pulling away from our warm body to reposition itself elsewhere. The push of your lover's exhale from their chest against yours followed instantly by his or her breath. I believe these sensual details to be at the heart of physical intimacy.
When I describe sex, it seems as if I often recount the story of two shadows making love. The positions of bodies, the start-stop of intercourse, the movements, rhythms and syncopations of two silhouettes disconnected from their other senses. If these descriptions are to inform the reader at all as to the actual events, than they are by their very nature less intimate than the experience itself. I suppose this is at it should be.
I write this because I think it is a metaphor for what my husband tried to describe for me after our dinner party concluded. He said he felt as though we were playing our parts, but there was no true intimacy amongst any of us. I agree. I think the nature of casual aquaintences congealing into sexual activity is less than just the warm kisses of my husband on my ankles when he rubs my feet. I think we reached for something bold, but instead found an experience that might have been on par with an adult film. At the time it was quite absorbing, but afterwards, there was no intensity of his submission to enjoy. Furthermore, my husband has been quite himself since the evening ended. This was very unlike our past experiences in which my nurturing was his opiate.
When I describe sex, it seems as if I often recount the story of two shadows making love. The positions of bodies, the start-stop of intercourse, the movements, rhythms and syncopations of two silhouettes disconnected from their other senses. If these descriptions are to inform the reader at all as to the actual events, than they are by their very nature less intimate than the experience itself. I suppose this is at it should be.
I write this because I think it is a metaphor for what my husband tried to describe for me after our dinner party concluded. He said he felt as though we were playing our parts, but there was no true intimacy amongst any of us. I agree. I think the nature of casual aquaintences congealing into sexual activity is less than just the warm kisses of my husband on my ankles when he rubs my feet. I think we reached for something bold, but instead found an experience that might have been on par with an adult film. At the time it was quite absorbing, but afterwards, there was no intensity of his submission to enjoy. Furthermore, my husband has been quite himself since the evening ended. This was very unlike our past experiences in which my nurturing was his opiate.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I read here often, but don't comment much. It looked like the couple you had over just wanted accomplish two things:
1) To play at what you do for real. The things she said where out straight off these cuckold sites you see on the Internet.
2) She was attacted to you and wanted to be with you.
Intimacy is something that develops over a period of time. One doesn't go to a "swinger's party" to find it. A "swinger's party" is about finding someone to have a new sexual experience with, hopefully an experience that's both fun and exciting. I think Lady Katherine and husband accomplished that. They met a wonderful couple, along with a third party, and had a rather hot sexual experience that I'm sure was fun for everyone. Lady Katherine may even have influence the other lady into experimenting with a Female Led Relationship. I'm sure that Lady Katherine and her husband at least triggered some curiosity on the other woman's part. Anyway, the writing as usual is excellent and truly sensuous to the reader's mind.
Post a Comment